<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for d-Visions (-o|o-)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.d-visions.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.d-visions.com</link>
	<description>as seen on d-visions.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 23:22:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on If Flash is Molehill, then Unity is Mountain by lishkaal</title>
		<link>http://blog.d-visions.com/2010/10/26/if-flash-is-molehill-then-unity-is-mountain/comment-page-1/#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>lishkaal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 23:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.d-visions.com/?p=42#comment-85</guid>
		<description>Hello D-Visions,

You are right that Flash is a hill and Unity is a mountain. But since I know that the Unity cache is only available under a rev share license of x% I am less inclined to use Unity.

I think the mountain dropped a few stones: Caching is basically a webstandard and a need nowadays for larger games.

I am now seriously considering 2.5D Flash first and then upgrade later to 3D.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello D-Visions,</p>
<p>You are right that Flash is a hill and Unity is a mountain. But since I know that the Unity cache is only available under a rev share license of x% I am less inclined to use Unity.</p>
<p>I think the mountain dropped a few stones: Caching is basically a webstandard and a need nowadays for larger games.</p>
<p>I am now seriously considering 2.5D Flash first and then upgrade later to 3D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on If Flash is Molehill, then Unity is Mountain by Christopher 'Jack' Nilssen</title>
		<link>http://blog.d-visions.com/2010/10/26/if-flash-is-molehill-then-unity-is-mountain/comment-page-1/#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher 'Jack' Nilssen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 00:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.d-visions.com/?p=42#comment-77</guid>
		<description>Great post, thank you!

Glad to see MAX hasn&#039;t changed much since I attended last year.  

Last year it was Flash on the iPod and their app store.  We saw how well that&#039;s worked out.

I applaud Adobe for being forward-thinking, but if they want to compete with Apple as software providers they should save their announcements so that they can finish their presentations with: &quot;... and is available today.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, thank you!</p>
<p>Glad to see MAX hasn&#8217;t changed much since I attended last year.  </p>
<p>Last year it was Flash on the iPod and their app store.  We saw how well that&#8217;s worked out.</p>
<p>I applaud Adobe for being forward-thinking, but if they want to compete with Apple as software providers they should save their announcements so that they can finish their presentations with: &#8220;&#8230; and is available today.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

